๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 687+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.2 out of 5(687 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$24.99
$41.65
Sale
โœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Compartments : Front pocketFastening : ZipDetails : BuckleArticle number : DI654H004-Q11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-on the house Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag

Compartments : Front pocket
Fastening : Zip
Details : Buckle
Article number : DI654H004-Q11

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 148822

Category: Women > Accessories > Bags & cases

Original Price: $41.65 USD

Sale Price: $24.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3547 reviews
LJ​
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Fantastic product
the BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag works as described and it works for me.
29 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker
8 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
treasure this BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag!
So far, it is practical and it works for me.
2 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Houston, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Five stars!
So far, it is straightforward to use so Iโ€™m okay with it.
3 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Tucson, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
astonishing BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag
Good build quality and design BLANCHARD UNISEX - Bum bag.​
14 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
From my experience, it performs as expected which is good enough.
49 people found this helpful