🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 634+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5(634 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

merely-arrived, in damaged box. Retails for $18

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid Shipping
↩️
hassle-no-cost Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold

fresh, in damaged box. Retails for $18

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 153521

Category: Beauty > Tools & Accessories > Tweezers

Original Price: $10 USD

Sale Price: $6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1842 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
The Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold is usable.
36 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
This Tweezerman, iconic Lash Curler, Rosegold is worth buying.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
I wouldn’t say it’s ideal, but the Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold is reliable.
19 people found this helpful
SM​
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
To be fair, the Tweezerman, iconic Lash Curler, Rosegold performs as expected and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
39 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely flawless
So far, the Tweezerman, timeless Lash Curler, Rosegold is effortless to use which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful