🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 511+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5(511 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$158.69​
$264.48
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

The battery is dead.Operation not confirmed.Sold as is.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch

The battery is dead.
Operation not confirmed.
Sold as is.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 398062

Category: Men > Men's Accessories > Watches

Original Price: $264.48 USD

Sale Price: $158.69 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7759 reviews
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch
Nice and practical Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch.​
9 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 days ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really superb
After certain use, the Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch works well enough which feels reasonable.
49 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
Nice quality and finish Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch.
50 people found this helpful

TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally pleased
The Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch feels solid so far.
18 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really splendid
After certain use, the Citizen Q&Q Retro Wristwatch feels solid and I’m satisfied. Packaging was plain.
31 people found this helpful