🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 278+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5(278 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$225.96
$376.6
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses



This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 477614

Category: Men > ACCESSORIES > Sunglasses

Original Price:$376.6 USD

Sale Price: $225.96 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2882 reviews
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
The Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses works magnificent for me.
20 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely satisfied
For the price, it performs as expected and I’m satisfied.
35 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable in every way
To be fair, the Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses performs as expected and I don’t regret it.
38 people found this helpful

RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
Nothing unusual to report about the Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses.
10 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
definitely impressed
The Tom Ford sunglasses Garrett (FT0862-S 56C) - lenses is uncomplicated to maintain.
19 people found this helpful