🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 430+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5(430 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26.53
$44.22
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Skull Sword Pendant Sterling Silver 925 L 1.21 x W 0.18 x H 3.33 0.4 Oz

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz

Skull Sword Pendant
Sterling Silver 925
L 1.21" x W 0.18" x H 3.33"
0.4 Oz

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 868707

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Pendants

Original Price: $44.22 USD

Sale Price: $26.53 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5300 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
marvelous product
The Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz is handy to understand.
32 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal for my needs
From my experience, it works as described so it’s acceptable. Arrived on time.
7 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
9 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly happy
After assorted use, the Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz feels solid and I’m satisfied.
20 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb investment
Packaging was fine.​
34 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
The Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz is smaller than I expected, but still usable.
3 people found this helpful