🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 783+ reviews
Men ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage 90's Polo Ralph Lauren Faded Navy Blue Fleece Crewneck Sweater

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5(783 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26.1
$43.5
Sale
✓ no-cost dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Flaws: Hole on backTagged MMeasurements in Photos

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping

↩️
hassle-on the house Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 90's Polo Ralph Lauren Faded Navy Blue Fleece Crewneck Sweater

Flaws: Hole on back
Tagged M
Measurements in Photos

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1892654

Category: Men > Sweaters > Crewneck

Original Price: $43.5 USD

Sale Price: $26.1 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 6543 reviews
KG
Kevin Green
11 months ago · Baltimore, MD
★★★★★
faultless purchase
Personally, it works fine and it works for me.
7 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Jacksonville, FL
★★★★★​
treasure love love!
For the price, it works well enough so it’s acceptable.
17 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark
1 year ago · Raleigh, NC
★★★★☆
superb Vintage 90's Polo Ralph Lauren Faded Navy Blue Fleece Crewneck Sweater
Personally, the Vintage 90's Polo Ralph Lauren Faded Navy Blue Fleece Crewneck Sweater is effortless to use and I’m satisfied. Arrived on time.
15 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · Phoenix, AZ
★★★★☆
terrific value for money
Honestly, it works fine and it meets expectations.
42 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Sacramento, CA
★★★★★
Exactly what I needed
The Vintage 90's Polo Ralph Lauren Faded Navy Blue Fleece Crewneck Sweater is smaller than I expected, but still usable.
11 people found this helpful