🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 823+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

John Varvatos Sunglasses V 539 Smoke 0smo

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5(823 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$95.5
$159.17
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Non-PolarizedAnti-Reflective Coating coating

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

John Varvatos Sunglasses V 539 Smoke 0smo

  • Non-Polarized
  • Anti-Reflective Coating coating

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1902376

Category: Men > ACCESSORIES > Sunglasses

Original Price: $159.17 USD

Sale Price: $95.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5884 reviews
DA
David Anderson
7 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
So far, the John Varvatos Sunglasses V 539 Smoke 0smo feels okay so I’m okay with it. fulfillment was normal.
2 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
Honestly, the John Varvatos Sunglasses V 539 Smoke 0smo works fine and I’m satisfied.
2 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid choice
At first, it works as described and I don’t regret it. Works fine so far.
19 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly happy
satisfactory control John Varvatos Sunglasses V 539 Smoke 0smo.
5 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely fancy it
To be fair, it is practical and it meets expectations.
3 people found this helpful